String Quartet no 10, opus 74, “The Harp” – Beethoven
“Primavera“ (1478)
___________
it’s 1809 and Beethoven rules, essentially,
the musical environment, he’s setting the
standard, the tone, for the century to
come and no one is anywhere close to
challenging his authority, music students
will remember Carl Czerny, Muzio Clementi,
for instance, but none of these, however
noteworthy, contemporaneous composers,
are even part of, anymore, the recital
curriculum, think of Salieri and Mozart,
for instance, without their mischief, who’s
heard recently of any Salieri
we’re not in Kansas anymore, this is the
start of the Romantic Era, four movements,
but not one of them is a minuet, a signature
element in a Classical composition, nor
could you, would you want to dance to
any of them
and this is where Beethoven starts to talk
rather than sing, music that you don’t just
listen to but read, note the disjointed
rhythms that interject rather than court,
if you’ll pardon the Classical reference,
from the very beginning of each
movement, of each, indeed, recapitulation,
music that is not at all genteel, but rousing,
commanding
how does he do this
note that his rhythms don’t fall on the
anticipated beat, they’re off, and
therefore disconcerting, you need to
get your bearings
then a motive, a musical idea that, as
the word suggests, motivates, like a
key to start an engine, will have an
odd, rather than an even, number of
notes, like trying to fit a square into
a circle, or a circle into a square, a
tricky combination for balanced, by
definition, bar lines, one’s intellectual
functions are thus activated, one
doesn’t rest in the comfort of a
prescribed cadence, but confronts
the rocky, though constantly
astonishing, even miraculous, road
of Beethoven’s invention, adventure,
if, of course, one’s into that
instead of Mary had a little lamb, in
other words, we’re hearing, a little
lamb has Marie, accent on the
wrong syllable, though here we
might call her Mary, she calls her
lamb Mouton, not unsurprisingly,
and it’s always, day after day,
beside her, which Beethoven then
sets, as idiosyncratically, to music
he’s, in other words, toying with
tempo – note the caesurae, the
pregnant pauses in a melody, the
multiplication of tempi throughout
the work as a whole, which imply
a narrative, a story, especially
without the traditional, and
diversionary, dance element
tonality remains essentially stable,
despite unusual juxtapositions, odd
intervals – the tonal reach along the
musical scale, A to G, between two
successive notes – which is to say,
we’re not yet at Stravinsky
but I find it interesting to observe
that recapitulation, the third
Classical imperative, along with
tempo and tonality, remains
uninterrupted, not even
questioned, indeed forcefully
reinvented
can there even be music without
recapitulation, I wonder, whereas
the other two have since lost their
immutability – I’m not sure, I’ll have
to check
thanks wholeheartedly for stopping
by
R ! chard