how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XI
“Funeral in the Snow near the Old Tower“ (1883)
_________
_________
___________
for Sarah and Rachel, the daughters
of the son of a dear cousin, after a
belated lunch recently, two young
girls, 14, 16, in bloom, as Proust
would say, who speak not only
music, but French and English,
fluently, I checked – perhaps
even German, their Oma
lives with them – they also
play the flute, the piano,
and sing, what could be
I ask you, more beautiful,
two young girls in bloom,
indeed in very blossom
or am I being too French
the form of the sonata had been established
decisively during the Classical Period, out
of the rudiments of Bach’s own such pieces,
Mozart and Haydn had given the concept its
final shape, its structure, three or four
contrasting movements, by definition all
entertainments
Beethoven kicked the entertainment part
right out of the ball park, made his show
into a veritable transcendental meditation,
rather than to merely applaud, audiences
gasped, were meant to be awed, as I still
ever am by his musical speculations
but by definition as well, a sonata is a
piece for a single instrument, therefore
inherently introspective, whether the
player has an audience or not, soloists,
note, play easily on their own
even an accompanied sonata, as violin
sonatas often are, for instance, or this
one for two pianos, would lose the
intimacy of a solo piece, for having
someone playing, however compatibly,
over one’s shoulder
in other words, a piano sonata is, by
definition, a monologue, a soliloquy,
where notes tell the story that words
would intimately, even confessionally,
in poetry, convey
the emotions that are elicited from
a piece are as real as they would
be from any literary alternative,
except that they’re quickened, like
aromas, through the senses, rather
than through divisive, by definition
confrontational, logic
rosemary reminds me always, for
instance, of one of my departed
aunts, like the taste of a madeleine
dipped in tea opened the door for
Proust to an entire earlier epoch,
the seed, the subject, of his
disquisition on Time, “À la
recherche du temps perdu“, “An
Exploration into Elapsed Time“,
my own translation, none of the
published proffered titles
having rendered the subtlety
of the shimmering original
rosemary, in other words, speaks,
if even only to me
listen to Tchaikovsky’s First Piano
Sonata, in C# minor, opus 80, one
of only two of his, what do you
hear, think, feel
R ! chard
Princess Friederike Luise of Prussia (1714-1784), Margravine of Brandenburg
____________
if you had trouble distinguishing your
Schubert from your Beethoven, you’ll
probably have trouble as well telling
your Mozart from your Haydn, though
you won’t find it difficult, if you listen,
to tell the earlier two from the latter
both the Haydn here, and the Mozart,
were written in 1789, the year of the
French Revolution, something akin
to our 9/11, the world changed from
one moment to the next
the first two were still doing parties,
which is to say, salon music, stuff
for elites, you can hear it, frivolities,
with, however magical, elaborations
– Liberace, I thought – nothing ever
as confessional as the two later
composers, who, with the new
fervour around individual opinion,
in the wake of questions even about
the validity of God, would create the
very Romantic Era
Mozart and Haydn explore songs,
ditties, Beethoven and Schubert
investigate very fundamental
musical constructions, they’re
down to the very essence of
tonal possibilities, something
that happened to the pictorial
arts in the 1950’s, as artists
probed the cerebral implications
of colour, see for instance,
Rothko
their probe itself becomes more
powerful than their apparent
subject, the tune, though the
melody proves to be, ever, the
cement that keeps the meditation
together
what it says, what they say, is
that confronting our destiny,
we remain the only arbiter, its
outcome will be as beautiful
as we make it, for better or for
worse, the creation of
something beautiful, a work
that can be so beautiful, much
like a life, seems to be a reply
that can somewhat, at least,
existentially satisfy a sense
of purpose
what, otherwise
R ! chard
psst: Mozart’s piano sonata was written
for Princess Friederike Luise of
Prussia, pictured above
“The conversation of Napoleon and Francois II“ (1808)
________
it’s 1804, Beethoven has entered his
Middle Period, left the more formal
constraints of the Classical Period,
Mozart and Haydn, behind, though
perhaps not essentially, the
structure remains, hardwired, but
its spirit is entirely different,
revolutionarily different, thanks to
Napoleon
and Beethoven is as opinionated
as the revolutionaries, boisterous,
adamant, peremptory even, he is
Zeus, and not undeservedly, at
the top of Olympus’ musical
mountain, where, incidentally,
he still prevails, harmony’s very
Homer
by his Opus 57, the “Appassionata”
– a name not of his own invention,
but, however discriminately, ascribed
later – he isn’t as metaphysical as
Schubert is in that later poet’s D960,
Beethoven is still writing descriptive
texts, torrid novels, however
masterfully illustrated, more than
the philosophical stuff he’ll later
undertake, even topping, when that
takes place, Schubert’s, ever,
nevertheless, transcendental D960,
if you can believe it
but Schubert remained a stripling,
Beethoven, his elder, was given the
grace to probe longer his humanity,
however might it have been equally
cruelly benighted, and to stretch his
speculative reach into previously
unimagined dimensions, beyond
the limited temporal scope of the
surely shriven since Schubert
all of whose wonders have defied
the harsh indignities of time, and
continue still to profoundly and
indelibly reverberate
R ! chard