Symphony no 8 in C minor, opus 65, “Stalingrad”- Dmitri Shostakovich
by richibi
“Sky and Water II“ (1938)
_______
stepping into Shostakovich’s Eighth
Symphony was to me like knocking
at someone’s apartment in the same
building but on the wrong floor,
everything was the same but
different
that had happened to me once before
when I‘d moved from the third floor
of my building, facing the laneway,
overlooking the dumpsters and the
derelicts, I used to say, cause I liked
the alliteration, just above the parking
lot, too few levels up, that spewed
exhaust from cars idling there,
interminably, especially early
mornings in winter
to the twelfth floor, with a view of the
mountains from my living room and
of the ocean from my bedroom, where
I’ve always said I see God/dess every
morning, every day
the floor plan was identical but for
being reversed, the living room on
the left, and the kitchen, in the first,
the bedroom straight ahead of you
as you entered, the living room on
the right, and the kitchen, the
bedroom straight ahead of you as
you entered, in the second
I called it going through the looking
glass, where indeed dumpsters and
derelicts had turned to daily sightings
of God/dess, a truly transcendental
experience
this had happened as well when I
went from atheism, crossed, I said,
the bridge of faith, but that’s
another story
Shostakovich’s Eighth is indeed a
reiteration of previous statements,
patterns are becoming familiar, the
strident opening subsiding into
plaintive laments is recognizable,
links to the Fifth and the Seventh
are evident, so are some of the,
eventually, longueurs, as we say
in French, excessive histrionics,
to my mind
but the third movement here is
nevertheless a stunner, worth
the price of admission, I’ve been
humming that one since in my,
though interrupted, sleep
here‘s a counterpart, however,
a piece I found serendipitously
as I pondered a response to a
cousin who’d asked about
Classical guitar, a piece written
in 1939, the time Shostakovich
was writing his Fourth, though
protectively then retracted, by
a Spanish composer, in another
part of the world, but equally
constricted, by Franco, a
contemporary autocrat, who
demanded art supportive of his
particular political apparatus
Joaquín Rodrigo – but he’s
another story – wrote his
magisterial “Concerto de
Aranjuez“, an utter triumph, a
strictly Classical composition,
three movements, with all the
tempi in the right order,
celebrating a palace, Aranjuez,
historically significant to the
Spanish, like Versailles is to
the French, thereby sidestepping
the local tyrant’s official censure
by skirting that ruler’s autocratic
political proscriptions
but Spain wasn’t massively
obliterating its people either,
as Stalin and Hitler were
theirs then, a crucial
consideration
in either case, these poets are
witnesses to history, and have
survived through their particular
statements, to tell individually,
and idiosyncratically, each his
redoubtable story, each of
which is forcefully telling, and
amazing
listen
R ! chard