Richibi’s Weblog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Tag: “Rhapsody” – Hans Hofmann

sonatas, continued (Rachmannov – “Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini”)

Rhapsody, 1958 - Hans Hofmann

    Rhapsody (1958) 

 

       Hans Hofmann

 
           ________
           

before putting variations aside, if only 

for the moment, let me explain why 

this piece, an essential component

in the history of the form in our 

Western Classical musical culture, 

is not called variations

 

let me get into it

 

Rachmaninov’s Rhapsody on a 

Theme of Paganini is, essentially, 

a set of variations, but even more 

so, it’s a concerto, for piano and 

orchestra 

 

what’s a concerto, a concerto is a 

sonata, a piece of music consisting 

of more than one segment, movement,   

but written for a full orchestra, and one 

central soloist

 

Rachmaninov has therefore combined

two musical forms, variations and the

concerto, but eliminated the pauses 

between the movements, thereby 

blocking his path to calling his work  

a concerto, which requires identifiable

separate movements

 

with variations, Rachmaninov asserts 

the significance of repetition in our 

Western Classical musical structure,

each variation returns us to its source,

making manifest repetition, tradition,

ritual, as primary, as essential to 

community, to one-on-one trust

 

but each variation allows also for a

difference in tempo, another essential

element of the Classical architecture, 

these two aspects are therefore in

something of a conflict

 

tonality, the third essential component

of Classical music, remains essentially

untouched, there are no discordant

episodes 

 

this will happen, but only later

 

meanwhile, listen

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XIV – more rhapsodies

Rhapsody, 1958 - Hans Hofmann

    

    Rhapsody” (1958) 

         

         Hans Hofmann

 

                _______

          

now that you’ve heard New York in

Gerschwin’s Rhapsody in Blue, and

Vienna in Rachmaninov’s Rhapsody

on a Theme of Paganini, listen to 

Hungary, or rather its Gypsy

component, however rejected, 

reviled, at the time, but proud 

enough, resilient, to strike back 

with its infectious music, how

many times have we heard that

story before

      

Budapest doesn’t sound at all like 

Vienna, though they’re only mere 

blocks away, essentially, listen,

Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsody no 2,

in C# minor, he wrote nineteen, 

you’ve probably heard this one,

it’s in our DNA

 

here are a couple of Spanish

rhapsodies, meanwhile, if we’re to 

follow a national agenda, Chabrier, 

a name you’ve probably never 

heard before, but not so, I assure

you, his music, his España,

Rhapsody for Orchestra, is

written in our blood, listen

 

Ravel wrote also a Rapsodie 

espagnole, more French than

Spanish, to my mind, steeped

in its early Twentieth Century

Impressionism,  all textures,

soundscapes, not rhythms

 

Ravel makes up for it, though, in his

Bolero, perhaps the most Hispanic 

piece ever of all, you tell me

 

both Chabrier and Ravel, incidentally, 

were French, doing what Dvořák, a 

Czech, had done, would do, for 

Americans, honour their fascinating

rhythms

 

Liszt, by the way, was Hungarian, his

rhapsodies were native, if profoundly

influenced by Vienna 

 

listen, enjoy

 

 

R ! chard

rhapsodies – Gershwin / Rachmaninov

rhapsody-1958.jpg!Large

  “Rhapsody (1958) 

 

      Hans Hofmann


          _________

 

if a sonata is a piece of music with more

than one section, by definition a rhapsody

is not a sonata, a rhapsody has only one 

section, only one movement, all that is 

required, therefore, essentially, of a 

rhapsody, is that it be – a subjunctive 

here, incidentally, the mood of aspiration, 

high hopes, ideals – that it be, I reiterate, 

rhapsodic

 

in the spirit of juxtaposition, here are two

rhapsodies, the first, George Gershwin’s 

Rhapsody in Blue“, the other 

Rachmaninov’s, his Rhapsody on a 

Theme of Paganini

 

how are they different, you tell me

 

I’ll just point out that the one seems, to 

my ears, steeped still in the Romantic 

Period, the early 19th Century, despite 

its publishing date, 1934, the other

earlier, composition, 1924, sounds like 

full blown, in comparison, 20th Century

America, the future 

 

Old Europe, in other words, meets the 

New World, however chronologically 

counterintuitively

 

listen, you can hear all of it, both are,

either era, extraordinary, time is what

eventually tells

 


R ! chard