Richibi’s Weblog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Category: music to ponder

November / Month of the Sonata – 1

Still life with seven apples, 1878 - Paul Cezanne

      Still Life with Seven Apples (1878) 

 

               Paul Cézanne

 

                      _____

 

 

a sonata is to the concerto what an apple

is to an apple pie, its essential component, 

after which the rest is decoration, however 

inspired

 

sonatas existed before Mozart, but he’s 

the one, along with Haydn, as well as

early Beethoven, who put them on the 

musical map, 1750 to 1800, more or 

less

 

it seems to me appropriate, therefore, 

to start my Sonata Month then

 

here’s something by Mozart, 1789, his 

last piano sonata, No. 18, in D major,

K. 576

 

three movements, fast, slow, fast – allegro, 

adagio, allegretto – a perfect example of 

the sonata as it was establishing itself

then, a piece of music consisting of 

several distinct sections, movements, 

meant to highlight contrasts, musical 

agility in the artist, compositional 

imagination

 

listen, enjoy

 

R ! chard

November / Month of the Sonata

The Sonata - Childe Hassam   

    “The Sonata  

           Childe Hassam

                    ____

                    

                    

having recently determined that a sonata

a day keeps the doctor away, and inspired

to work upon that cure, I thought I’d initiate 

a Sonata Month starting in November

 

there are thirty days in November, so no 

more than thirty sonatas, each of which

will, I promise, be a revelation

 

a sonata is a piece of music consisting

of more than just one part, traditionally 

three or four, called movements

 

within those parameters, anything was,

is, possible, any kind of music, times 

three or four, traditionally, Classically

 

but traditions indeed applied, the tried 

and true, fast, slow, fast, became the 

standard, a cheery introduction, 

followed by a contrasting, which is to 

say slower, middle section, then a 

restorative, final, energetic, act, meant 

to send you, reinvigorated, on your way, 

maybe even an equally vivacious fourth

 

there’ll be sonatas with one movement, 

some seven, some with even maybe 

more

 

here’s one, for instance, listen, enjoy 

 

and stay tuned   

 

and thanks for joining in

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XVIII – Rachmaninov

Portrait of the composer Sergei Rachmaninov, 1925 - Konstantin Somov

 

     Portrait of the composer Sergei Rachmaninov

 

                   Konstantin Somov

 

                                ______

 

though you probably still wouldn’t be able

to tell a prelude from a hole in the wall, 

nor, admittedly, can I, unless indicated,

if you’ve listened to the pieces I’ve

recently presented, you’ve noted, even 

merely sensed, really, that the preludes 

of one composer don’t sound at all like

those of the others, Bach doesn’t sound 

like Chopin, who doesn’t sound at all   

like Debussy, the first step in telling  

your Beethoven from your Bach, as 

promised in my title

 

you might not even be able to tell which  

is which as you’re listening, but you can

tell they’re different, you do the same 

thing telling your Monet from your 

Renoir

 

Rachmaninov also wrote, like Chopin, 

and Debussy, 24 preludes, and, like 

Chopin, in every key, major and minor

 

but spread out through three publications, 

Opus 3, no. 2from 1892, comprising of 

only one prelude, but a scorcher, The 

Bells of Moscow, listen

a second set, Opus 23, consists of ten, 

mostly iconic, pieces, you’ve heard 

them somewhere before, therefore 

iconic

 

the final set comes out in 1910, 

Opus 32with thirteen preludes,

for a total of 24

 

you’ll marvel, even Marilyn Monroe 

famously did

 

enjoy 

 

 

R ! chard 

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XVII – on preludes

A Prelude by Bach, 1868 - Simeon Solomon

       A Prelude by Bach (1868)              

              Simeon Solomon

                     __________

what’s a prelude 

as the word suggests – pre, from the

Latin, means before, lūdus, again 

from the Latin, means game, play, 

spectacle – it is a piece of music that 

precedes another more elaborate 

segment in a compositional whole

 

a prelude is therefore likely to be short,

otherwise completely improvisatory,

no technical demands, just something 

that comes from the heart

 

there probably existed preludes before 

Bach, but he’s the one who put them 

on the map, with, specifically, his 

monumental Preludes and Fugues,

though that’s another story, more 

about which later, but he did write 

some stand-alone preludes, for 

instance his Six Little Preludes,  

BWV 933-938, from around 1717

to 1720, see above

 

a little over a hundred years later,

in 1834, Chopin picked up the 

mantle and wrote his own iconic

Opus 28, 24 stand-alone preludes,

one for every major and minor key, 

and established thereby the prelude 

as a viable musical form

 

nearly a hundred years later still, 

Debussy set up his own homage 

to Chopin, in two bursts of inspired 

composition, the twelve preludes of 

his Book 1 in 1909 to 1910, followed 

by his Book 2, again of twelve preludes, 

written in 1912 to 1913

 

these works are now generally played 

in complete sets, though they often 

pop up individually as short and sweet  

encores here and there at the end of 

successful recitals

 

enjoy

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XVI – on Chopin

The Old Burgtheater, 1888 - 1889 - Gustav Klimt

       The Old Burgtheater (1888 – 1889)  

                  Gustav Klimt

                        _______

  

having brought up nocturnes and ballades

in my last instalment, however peripherally, 

I’ll dig into these deeper, to illustrate the 

impact Romanticism had on music, on 

fine arts as well, and literature, in the 

West, as it highlighted emotions as a 

requirement of the audiences that 

funded them

 

the French Revolution had happened,

the idea of individual rights, liberty,

equality, fraternity, spread across 

even autocracies, czars, kaisers, 

kings were threatened

 

theatres were becoming, because of 

the growth of the Middle Class, what 

had been the salons of the aristocrats,

people were paying for what the nobility

had been seeing, in concert halls, see

above

 

but the audience wanted their money’s 

worth, both in spectacle, and personal

contact, easy ingenuity was out, they

had to be impacted, get them howling,

whooping, just like today

 

but to return to ballades and nocturnes,

they were the answer, plangent appeals

to the heart, which had not been a 

concern of the earlier Classical Period,

where prestidigitation, technical

wizardry, had been the requirement

of the courtly courts  

 

ballades, nocturnes, preludes, didn’t 

exist before the Romantic Period, 

essentially, music that hadn’t a 

formal structure, hadn’t a set of 

compositional rules, but spoke, 

rather, from a place of intimacy,

unconstrainedly

 

here’s a balladefor instance, here’s 

a nocturne, both of Chopin, as 

identifiable as Shakespeare, van 

Gogh, in each their own particular 

vocabulary, wearing his heart on

his sleeve, and always absolutely 

extraordinary 

 

enjoy

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XV – what’s a rhapsody

Rhapsody of Steel, 1959 - Eyvind Earle

        Rhapsody of Steel (1959)

                   Eyvind Earle

                       ________

so what’s a rhapsody

if you’ve been following at all my 

musical adventure, you’ll have 

heard by now several rhapsodies 

 

at first, I suggested that the rhapsody

was an evolution from the fantasia,

a piece of music in one movement

that allowed for any internal 

construction, but that, after the

Classical Period, became imbued  

with Romanticism, passion became 

a condition of music, mere technical

ability was no longer enough  

 

note that the audience was different,

rather than nobles who commissioned

artists to decorate their salons, the

burgeoning Middle Class was hungry 

for them to entertain, performers were

becoming the main attraction, not just

the background, see, for instance, 

Beethoven

 

but not only did rhapsodies spread 

from just one player to an entire

orchestra – see Brahms, then 

see Gershwin – but its essential 

structure, one movement, was 

challenged, see Ravel here, or 

Rachmaninov, whose rhapsodies 

are both composed of distinct 

movements, Rachmaninov even 

further refining his movements 

into variations, for years, I 

referred to his Rhapsody on a 

Theme of Paganini as his 

Variations

 

all this to say that a rhapsody is 

turning out to be not identified 

by its structure, its technical

parts, but rather by its intention,

a rhapsody is in the eye of its 

composer, like a nocturne, or 

a ballade

 

I’d thought that rhapsodies had 

been relegated to the Romantic 

Era, with the occasional later 

tribute

 

who, I wondered, could be

writing rhapsodies anymore

 

but here’s something, however

unexpectedly, you’ll be familiar

with, from 1975, Queen’s Bohemian

Rhapsodyin several movements 

– intro, ballad, opera, hard rock, 

outro – and including in all of them,

note, voice

 

all of which speaks of tradition

being a lot closer than one would 

think, ancestral, residual, but

defining, traces, like genes, 

however updated, however

posthumously interpreted,

pervade, infiltrate, pursue,

inexorably

 

rhapsodies are in our DNA, it

would appear, for better or for 

worse, ever

 

here’s to them

 

 

R ! chard

 
 
 

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XIV – more rhapsodies

Rhapsody, 1958 - Hans Hofmann

    

    Rhapsody” (1958) 

         

         Hans Hofmann

 

                _______

          

now that you’ve heard New York in

Gerschwin’s Rhapsody in Blue, and

Vienna in Rachmaninov’s Rhapsody

on a Theme of Paganini, listen to 

Hungary, or rather its Gypsy

component, however rejected, 

reviled, at the time, but proud 

enough, resilient, to strike back 

with its infectious music, how

many times have we heard that

story before

      

Budapest doesn’t sound at all like 

Vienna, though they’re only mere 

blocks away, essentially, listen,

Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsody no 2,

in C# minor, he wrote nineteen, 

you’ve probably heard this one,

it’s in our DNA

 

here are a couple of Spanish

rhapsodies, meanwhile, if we’re to 

follow a national agenda, Chabrier, 

a name you’ve probably never 

heard before, but not so, I assure

you, his music, his España,

Rhapsody for Orchestra, is

written in our blood, listen

 

Ravel wrote also a Rapsodie 

espagnole, more French than

Spanish, to my mind, steeped

in its early Twentieth Century

Impressionism,  all textures,

soundscapes, not rhythms

 

Ravel makes up for it, though, in his

Bolero, perhaps the most Hispanic 

piece ever of all, you tell me

 

both Chabrier and Ravel, incidentally, 

were French, doing what Dvořák, a 

Czech, had done, would do, for 

Americans, honour their fascinating

rhythms

 

Liszt, by the way, was Hungarian, his

rhapsodies were native, if profoundly

influenced by Vienna 

 

listen, enjoy

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XIII – Antonin Dvořák

American Gothic, 1930 - Grant Wood

    “American Gothic (1930) 

 

                Grant Wood        

 

                      ______

   

if you were able to hear the difference

in my last communication between

Vienna and New York in the two

rhapsodies I compared, contemporaries,

incidentally, you might be interested in

European composer, highly

underestimated in my opinion, who

bridges both cultures by composing a

tribute to the country that receives him,

gloriously, for a couple of years, before

he returns, homesick, to his beloved

Bohemia, which is to say, Prague,

Antonín Dvořák, don’t ask, 1841 – 1904

 

here’s his 12th String Quartetnicknamed

the “American”, listen, you’ll understand

why

 

here’s his New World Symphonyagain

you’ll understand why

 

fun facts, Neil Armstrong brought a

recording of it, the New World

Symphonywith him to the moon

during the first manned landing,

back in 1969, can you get more

cool than that

 

also, this particular version is from

Pyongyang, which is to say, North

Korea, which is to say, the audience

here is nearly as interesting as the

symphony itself, do they even

speak the language, if they grew

up on Chinese opera

 

do you

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XII – on rhapsodies 

Rhapsody, 1958 - Hans Hofmann

   Rhapsody (1958) 

           Hans Hofman 

                       _____

 

if, in my last instalment, I compared iconic

funeral marches, let me do the same for

a couple of iconic rhapsodies, another 

musical form that came and went, that’s

come and gone, but not forgotten

what’s a rhapsody

as far as I can make out, it’s much the 

same as a fantasia, if you can remember 

what a fantasia is, a free form composition, 

but with a Romantic, which is to say a 

heartfelt, twist, more pathos, less 

technical wizardry

 

Gershwin wrote his Rhapsody in Blue 

in 1924, you can hear New York, Times 

Square, Broadway, from the first wail 

of the languid horn

 

Rachmaninov’s Rhapsody on a Theme

of Paganini, written in 1934, ten years 

later, gives you, however, Vienna, its 

Romantic Period, the traditions of, 

a century earlier, Beethoven, Schubert 

 

Rachmaninov is personal, introspective,

tragic, Gershwin is extroverted, social, 

fun

 

Rachmaninov looked back to his 

European, Old World, traditions, 

Gershwin augurs an entirely new 

voice 

 

listen, you can hear it 

enjoy

 

 

R ! chard   

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XI

Funeral in the Snow near the Old Tower, 1883 - Vincent van Gogh

          Funeral in the Snow near the Old Tower (1883)

                          

                        Vincent van Gogh

                            _________

having introduced, however peripherally, in my

last instalment, Chopin’s Piano Sonata no 2,

it wouldn’t be fair to not present Beethoven’s

Piano Sonata no 12 to compare, they both

contain iconic funeral marches, written, even

if you have no interest at all in such music, in 

the blood of our Western culture, like

Shakespeare, to be or not to be, you’ve

heard the line, somewhere, even if you have

no idea what he might’ve been talking about

 

I don’t need to point out the dirges among 

the movements, the solemn bits, they will

impose themselves, whether you’re paying

attention or not

                                       

                                         

Beethoven and Chopin sound a lot alike,

Beethoven, 1770 -1827, is earlier, pushed

the Classical Period into the Romantic Era,

pretty well, astonishingly, by himself

 

Chopin, 1810 – 1849, gives us the pinnacle

of Romantic music

 

I tell them apart by their beat, Chopin is

always on, Beethoven is always off, his

schtick, his revolutionary spirit, Chopin,

rather, played for the aristocracy, in

their courtly salons, much like Haydn,

but that’s another story

 

you might notice also that the last

movement in Chopin’s sonata is

all texture, a precursor to the later

Impressionism, in all of the arts

 

Beethoven, however, always takes

you on a journey, never gives you

merely background, there’s always

a core, a foundational melody

 

enjoy

 

 

R ! chard