Richibi’s Weblog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Category: concerts to ponder

sonatas, continued (Rachmannov – “Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini”)

Rhapsody, 1958 - Hans Hofmann

    Rhapsody (1958) 

 

       Hans Hofmann

 
           ________
           

before putting variations aside, if only 

for the moment, let me explain why 

this piece, an essential component

in the history of the form in our 

Western Classical musical culture, 

is not called variations

 

let me get into it

 

Rachmaninov’s Rhapsody on a 

Theme of Paganini is, essentially, 

a set of variations, but even more 

so, it’s a concerto, for piano and 

orchestra 

 

what’s a concerto, a concerto is a 

sonata, a piece of music consisting 

of more than one segment, movement,   

but written for a full orchestra, and one 

central soloist

 

Rachmaninov has therefore combined

two musical forms, variations and the

concerto, but eliminated the pauses 

between the movements, thereby 

blocking his path to calling his work  

a concerto, which requires identifiable

separate movements

 

with variations, Rachmaninov asserts 

the significance of repetition in our 

Western Classical musical structure,

each variation returns us to its source,

making manifest repetition, tradition,

ritual, as primary, as essential to 

community, to one-on-one trust

 

but each variation allows also for a

difference in tempo, another essential

element of the Classical architecture, 

these two aspects are therefore in

something of a conflict

 

tonality, the third essential component

of Classical music, remains essentially

untouched, there are no discordant

episodes 

 

this will happen, but only later

 

meanwhile, listen

 

R ! chard

November / Month of the Sonata – 14

The Old Burgtheater, 1888 - 1889 - Gustav Klimt

     “The Old Burgtheater (1888 – 1889)  

 

              Gustav Klimt

 

                  _______

 

 

cause most composers, including the great 

ones, didn’t write many sonatas, or not many

to equal their greatest compositions, I’ll skip

directly from Bach to Beethoven, who first

gave sonatas their commanding position 

on the cultural map

 

he wrote 32, the early ones competent, 

even admirable, others inspiring, several

completely transcendental

 

of the 32, here’s the first of my favourites,

his 15th, in E major, Opus 28, the 

“Pastorale”, German spelling, of 1801

 

you might wonder about all the letters and

numbers in the naming of early music, much

of it compiled by later musicologists, cause

titles hadn’t been given to musical pieces,

even Beethoven’s “Pastorale” had been 

later provided by his publisher

 

music before the late Classical Period 

might’ve been written down, but not 

widely distributed, there wasn’t a 

market for it until the advent of the 

Middle Class, who now wanted 

access to what the aristocracy had

 

earlier, what compositions existed

would’ve been the property not of

the composer, but of the duke, 

baron, or prince who’d hired him 

for his court, see Haydn here, for 

instance, and the Estherházys

 

when greater demand grew for music 

manuscripts, titles little by little became 

a manner of increasing marketing,

scores found their way throughout 

Europe to supply the many amateurs

who’d gather and play before we had

television

 

some of these amateurs became 

noteworthy performers, who also 

began to proliferate, to fill the

burgeoning concert halls, 

see above

 

incidentally, there’s also a “Pastorale”

Symphony of Beethoven, in F major,

Opus 68, you might want to listen to  

and compare

 

enjoy

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XVI – on Chopin

The Old Burgtheater, 1888 - 1889 - Gustav Klimt

       The Old Burgtheater (1888 – 1889)  

                  Gustav Klimt

                        _______

  

having brought up nocturnes and ballades

in my last instalment, however peripherally, 

I’ll dig into these deeper, to illustrate the 

impact Romanticism had on music, on 

fine arts as well, and literature, in the 

West, as it highlighted emotions as a 

requirement of the audiences that 

funded them

 

the French Revolution had happened,

the idea of individual rights, liberty,

equality, fraternity, spread across 

even autocracies, czars, kaisers, 

kings were threatened

 

theatres were becoming, because of 

the growth of the Middle Class, what 

had been the salons of the aristocrats,

people were paying for what the nobility

had been seeing, in concert halls, see

above

 

but the audience wanted their money’s 

worth, both in spectacle, and personal

contact, easy ingenuity was out, they

had to be impacted, get them howling,

whooping, just like today

 

but to return to ballades and nocturnes,

they were the answer, plangent appeals

to the heart, which had not been a 

concern of the earlier Classical Period,

where prestidigitation, technical

wizardry, had been the requirement

of the courtly courts  

 

ballades, nocturnes, preludes, didn’t 

exist before the Romantic Period, 

essentially, music that hadn’t a 

formal structure, hadn’t a set of 

compositional rules, but spoke, 

rather, from a place of intimacy,

unconstrainedly

 

here’s a balladefor instance, here’s 

a nocturne, both of Chopin, as 

identifiable as Shakespeare, van 

Gogh, in each their own particular 

vocabulary, wearing his heart on

his sleeve, and always absolutely 

extraordinary 

 

enjoy

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XV – what’s a rhapsody

Rhapsody of Steel, 1959 - Eyvind Earle

        Rhapsody of Steel (1959)

                   Eyvind Earle

                       ________

so what’s a rhapsody

if you’ve been following at all my 

musical adventure, you’ll have 

heard by now several rhapsodies 

 

at first, I suggested that the rhapsody

was an evolution from the fantasia,

a piece of music in one movement

that allowed for any internal 

construction, but that, after the

Classical Period, became imbued  

with Romanticism, passion became 

a condition of music, mere technical

ability was no longer enough  

 

note that the audience was different,

rather than nobles who commissioned

artists to decorate their salons, the

burgeoning Middle Class was hungry 

for them to entertain, performers were

becoming the main attraction, not just

the background, see, for instance, 

Beethoven

 

but not only did rhapsodies spread 

from just one player to an entire

orchestra – see Brahms, then 

see Gershwin – but its essential 

structure, one movement, was 

challenged, see Ravel here, or 

Rachmaninov, whose rhapsodies 

are both composed of distinct 

movements, Rachmaninov even 

further refining his movements 

into variations, for years, I 

referred to his Rhapsody on a 

Theme of Paganini as his 

Variations

 

all this to say that a rhapsody is 

turning out to be not identified 

by its structure, its technical

parts, but rather by its intention,

a rhapsody is in the eye of its 

composer, like a nocturne, or 

a ballade

 

I’d thought that rhapsodies had 

been relegated to the Romantic 

Era, with the occasional later 

tribute

 

who, I wondered, could be

writing rhapsodies anymore

 

but here’s something, however

unexpectedly, you’ll be familiar

with, from 1975, Queen’s Bohemian

Rhapsodyin several movements 

– intro, ballad, opera, hard rock, 

outro – and including in all of them,

note, voice

 

all of which speaks of tradition

being a lot closer than one would 

think, ancestral, residual, but

defining, traces, like genes, 

however updated, however

posthumously interpreted,

pervade, infiltrate, pursue,

inexorably

 

rhapsodies are in our DNA, it

would appear, for better or for 

worse, ever

 

here’s to them

 

 

R ! chard

 
 
 

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XIII – Antonin Dvořák

American Gothic, 1930 - Grant Wood

    “American Gothic (1930) 

 

                Grant Wood        

 

                      ______

   

if you were able to hear the difference

in my last communication between

Vienna and New York in the two

rhapsodies I compared, contemporaries,

incidentally, you might be interested in

European composer, highly

underestimated in my opinion, who

bridges both cultures by composing a

tribute to the country that receives him,

gloriously, for a couple of years, before

he returns, homesick, to his beloved

Bohemia, which is to say, Prague,

Antonín Dvořák, don’t ask, 1841 – 1904

 

here’s his 12th String Quartetnicknamed

the “American”, listen, you’ll understand

why

 

here’s his New World Symphonyagain

you’ll understand why

 

fun facts, Neil Armstrong brought a

recording of it, the New World

Symphonywith him to the moon

during the first manned landing,

back in 1969, can you get more

cool than that

 

also, this particular version is from

Pyongyang, which is to say, North

Korea, which is to say, the audience

here is nearly as interesting as the

symphony itself, do they even

speak the language, if they grew

up on Chinese opera

 

do you

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, XII – on rhapsodies 

Rhapsody, 1958 - Hans Hofmann

   Rhapsody (1958) 

           Hans Hofman 

                       _____

 

if, in my last instalment, I compared iconic

funeral marches, let me do the same for

a couple of iconic rhapsodies, another 

musical form that came and went, that’s

come and gone, but not forgotten

what’s a rhapsody

as far as I can make out, it’s much the 

same as a fantasia, if you can remember 

what a fantasia is, a free form composition, 

but with a Romantic, which is to say a 

heartfelt, twist, more pathos, less 

technical wizardry

 

Gershwin wrote his Rhapsody in Blue 

in 1924, you can hear New York, Times 

Square, Broadway, from the first wail 

of the languid horn

 

Rachmaninov’s Rhapsody on a Theme

of Paganini, written in 1934, ten years 

later, gives you, however, Vienna, its 

Romantic Period, the traditions of, 

a century earlier, Beethoven, Schubert 

 

Rachmaninov is personal, introspective,

tragic, Gershwin is extroverted, social, 

fun

 

Rachmaninov looked back to his 

European, Old World, traditions, 

Gershwin augurs an entirely new 

voice 

 

listen, you can hear it 

enjoy

 

 

R ! chard   

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, IX

The Spanish Guitarist, 1897 - Pierre-Auguste Renoir

          The Spanish Guitarist” (1897)

 

                  Pierre-Auguste Renoir

 
 

                            ____________

 

just as I was about to relegate the trill

to Mozart and the Classical Period, I

inadvertently came upon something

wonderful by Joaquín Rodrigo, a

Spanish composer, 1901 – 1999, a

concerto for guitar

 

the trill had been decorative, meant to

appeal to aristocrats frequenting

salons

 

then the French Revolution happened,

and the growth of the Middle Class,

and consequently popular avenues

of entertainment for the liberated,

concert halls, for instance, looked

for a more emotionally powerful

experience, arpeggios took care of

that

 

the trill died

 

but in 1939, nearly two centuries

later, Rodrigo wrote his Concierto

de Aranjueza descendent pays

homage to an elder, trills abound

 

it should be stated that a guitar can

play only one note at a time, it might

be that trills lend themselves better

to such an instrument than an

arpeggio would

 

then again, I’ve found that Spanish

music, the tango, the tarantella, for 

instance, see above, has held more

rigidly to the imperatives of Western 

music I’ve spoken of here before,

tempo, tonality, repetition, it is not 

Debussy, Ravel, it is not even

Chopin, it is peripheral, maybe, to

the cultural establishment, but

potent, steeped in blood and

tradition

 

here’s Rodrigo giving you Mozart

 

enjoy

 

 

R ! chard

how to listen to music if you don’t know your Beethoven from your Bach, V

Waltz, 1891 - Anders Zorn

           

       Waltz” (1891)

 

        Anders Zorn

 

           ________

 

having brought up the idea of

longevity in my last communication,

the fantasiaa musical form that

lasted about 150 years, with hats

off nevertheless to the later Disney

classic, Fantasiaa tribute, which,

full of Classical music references,

followed in its spiritual mode, and,

after introducing Chopin, perhaps

the very representation of the

Romantic Era, that we carry, or

intuit, in our very bones, I thought

I’d talk about the waltz, a Chopin

specialty, where he created,

incontrovertibly, utter magic

 

who hears of the waltz anymore, an

antiquated curiosity, though even in

our not so distant blood we feel the

reverberations of its memory, the

throb of its still vibrant cultural

intensity, relevance, rhythm

 

tangos, incidentally followed, and

other intimate interactions, which

had been earlier frowned upon

 

the waltz had been the minuet,

the difference was the physical

contact, young nobles left their

aristocratic salons, however

discreetly, to frequent the

more liberal, if disreputable,

establishments – like to

speakeasies during Prohibition

– where they could explore the

new, licentious venues, as

young nobles, ever, would, for

the lure of intimate connection

with the partner

 

the waltz was thereby born,

couples touched, breast upon

breast, composers followed

 

Chopin was metaphysical, you

didn’t dance to his waltzes, you

experienced them, here’s his

Minute Waltz, Opus 64, no 1,

here’s his equally delightful

Opus 64, no 2, its companion

 

but Strauss ll, Johann l‘s son,

got all of Vienna to dance his, 

and everywhere else after, until  

the waltz fell out of favour 

somewhere in the 1950s, leaving

only its memories behind,  here’s          

his incandescent By the Beautiful

Blue Danubemakes you wish

you’d been there

           

in the one case, the waltz is

idealized, in the other, it’s the

waltz in action, listen, you can

tell the difference, you won’t 

want to dance, for instance, to 

Chopinthough you might give

it an ineffectual try, to Strauss

you’ll careen

 

 

R ! chard

Piano Concerto no 20, K.466 – Mozart (Uchida)

mozart-2015.jpg!Large

  Mozart (2015)

 

       Bernd Luz

 

          ______

 

having been immersed recently, indeed 

consumed by, Ovid, his Metamorphoses, 

for four months now, according to a 

friend, since, however improbably, April, 

and we’re now in mid-August, I’ve been 

redirected recently, not only for

metaphysical breath, but by friends 

who’ve brought up other ideological 

realities

 

I watched a concert on TV yesterday, 

my mother said this morning when I 

went over for coffee, she lives, 

providentially, to my mind, only a few 

blocks away, we touch bases regularly

 

great, I reacted, I’ve got it on tape, I 

was meaning to watch it later

 

the pianist, she marvelled, also

conducted, I’ve never seen that

 

I cheered her on, and couldn’t wait to 

see for myself when I got home

 

but couldn’t watch more than a few 

moments, the pianist / conductor, 

famous in his day, had become 

crotchety, decrepit, the piece was 

Mozart, you can’t play Mozart with 

arthritic fingers

 

which had me finding the mistress of 

Mozart on the internet, unmatched at 

Mozart to this day, Mitsuko Uchida, 

watch her transform Mozart’s flights 

of lyrical fantasy into utter, and 

irrepressible, magic, sent it to my

mom for incontrovertible 

corroboration

 

his 20th Piano Concerto, K.466

 

watch, marvel   

 

 

R ! chard

 

 

Chopin Piano Concerto no. 1

the-monument-to-chopin-in-the-luxembourg-gardens-1909.jpg!Large

   “The Monument to Chopin in the Luxembourg Gardens (1909) 

 

             Henri Rousseau

 

                   ________

 

                                               for Joselyn, thanks for the tip

 

 

one good Chopin Piano Concerto deserves

another, especially if it is, to my mind, superior,

however ever be these things entirely subjective, 

you decide 

 

here’s his First, listen, be mesmerized

 

 

R ! chard