Just another WordPress.com weblog

___________
if you’ve listened to the first two
Beethoven piano concertos here,
you’ll find the Third to be very
similar in structure, the first
movement is an allegro, which is
to say it’s fast, and in the manner
of Beethoven, brash, tempestuous,
exhilarating, the second, slow, an
adagio, or a largo, is plaintive,
melancholy, mournful, the third,
brisk, ebullient, commanding, is
again an allegro
the form is descended from Mozart
and the Classical Period, of which
Beethoven is the tail end, but the
entrails of his pieces are entirely
upended and revolutionary
Beethoven demands your attention,
his music is no longer the backdrop
for social gatherings of the
aristocracy, but performances for
intent audiences
compare, for instance, Mozart’s
demure affair, however
impressive
there are several similarities, both
pieces are in C minor, a downcast
key traditionally, but most notably,
the intial musical motive, or idea,
at the top of either concerto, their
first few introductory notes, are
the same, you’ll recognize them
but Mozart is never in your face,
insisting upon your attention with
eccentric rhythms and jerky
musical progressions, not to
mention loud and aggressive
presents, but lulls one, rather,
into his reverie with an ever
polite discourse from a
deferential soloist, courteous
and beholden, however ever
illustrious, from the first note
to the last
in the visual arts, it’d be like
comparing a Courbet, say, to a
Monet, it’s a question, given
their overlapping time periods,
of accent, and sentiment
you’ll need in either case, of
either, a keen ear, a keen eye
R ! chard